On January 27, 2022, the SEC re-opened the comment period on proposed rules under the Dodd-Frank Act requiring disclosure of information reflecting the relationship between executive compensation actually paid by a company and the company’s financial performance (“Pay vs. Performance”). The rules were previously proposed in April 2015, and have languished since then (see HERE). In addition to re-opening the comment period on the 2015 proposed rules, the SEC has expanded the proposal to include additional performance metrics.
The SEC administration under Gary Gensler has been actively tacking compensation and insider trading related issues recently including re-visiting executive compensation clawback rules (see HERE); publishing new guidance on disclosures and accounting for spring-loaded compensation awards (see HERE); proposing amendments to Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans (see HERE); and proposing new share repurchase program disclosure rules (see HERE).
Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act added Section 14(i) to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Section 14(i) requires the SEC to adopt rules mandating issuers to disclose, in any proxy or consent solicitation material for an annual meeting of shareholders, a clear description of any compensation required to be disclosed Item 402 of Regulation S-K. Item 402 sets forth the disclosure requirements related to executive compensation. Section 14(i) would add Item 402(v) to require that the disclosure include the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and the financial performance of the company taking into account any change in the value of the shares of stock and dividends of the company and any distributions. Section 14(i) further provides that the disclosure may include a graphic representation of the information required to be disclosed.
Although the current rules require many metrics and details on executive compensation, none previously have required a specific disclosure on the relationship between pay and performance. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) required by Item 402(b) requires an explanation of “all material elements of the registrant’s compensation of the named executive officers” and requires general discussions of performance including disclosure of any bonus structures and performance-based compensation. The new disclosure requirements will supplement this information by providing a factual description of how the executive compensation actually paid related to the financial performance of the company.
In accordance with the proposed rules, a company must include a new table disclosing compensation “actually paid” to the principal executive offer or CEO and to the other named executive officers and the corresponding “total compensation” amounts for the prior five fiscal years or three fiscal years for smaller reporting companies. The five- or three-year look-back, as applicable, is subject to a phase-in period for the new rules. The table must include:
- The total executive compensation of the principal executive officer (“PEO”) and the average of the total compensation of other named executive officers (“NEO”) as reported in the summary compensation table (note the summary compensation table is already a required Item 402 disclosure in proxy and information statements);
- The executive compensation “actually paid” to the PEO and the average of the executive compensation actually paid to the other NEO. The new proposed rules delineate the required elements and calculation for this disclosure;
- The cumulative total shareholder return (TSR), calculated in the same manner as the performance graph already required by current SEC rules.
Item 402 defines the NEOs for whom disclosure is required as: (i) all individuals serving as the registrant’s principal executive officer (“PEO”) or acting in a similar capacity during the last completed fiscal year, regardless of compensation level, (ii) all individuals serving as the registrant’s principal financial officer (“PFO”) or acting in a similar capacity during the last completed fiscal year, regardless of compensation level, (iii) the registrant’s three most highly compensated executive officers other than the PEO and PFO who were serving as executive officers at the end of the last completed fiscal year, and (iv) up to two additional individuals for whom Item 402 of Regulation S-K disclosure would have been provided but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer of the registrant at the end of the last completed fiscal year.
The new proposed disclosure requirements will not apply to emerging growth companies or foreign private issuers. In addition, smaller public companies will have a scaled back disclosure requirement – for a refresher on the definition of a smaller reporting company, see HERE.
Disclosure of compensation “actually paid”
The proposed new rules delineate the elements of and calculation for the required compensation “actually paid” disclosure. For smaller reporting companies, the compensation “actually paid” is the executive compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table disclosure already required to be disclosed in the proxy and information statements in accordance with existing Item 402. All companies other than smaller reporting companies must then modify the disclosed amount to exclude changes in actuarial present value of benefits under defined benefit and actuarial pension plans that are not attributable to the applicable year of service, and to include the fair value of equity awards at vesting rather than when granted.
Relationship with Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
The new rules require companies to measure financial performance using TSR as defined in Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K and to make a comparison with the TSR of the company and the compensation actually paid for both the CEO and an average of all the other named executive officers. Using the values disclosed in the table, the company must disclose the relationship between the executive compensation actually paid and the company’s TSR. The company can make the disclosure either using a narrative discussion, a graph or a combination of both. Interestingly, the company has flexibility as to the location of the discussion and it is not required to be included in the CD&A section. Companies that are not smaller reporting companies must also provide disclosure on the relationship between the company’s TSR and the TSR of a peer group as chosen by the reporting company.
In addition to TSR, the SEC is considering requiring a tabular disclosure of pre-tax income, net income and a company selected measure that would be specific to each registrant. A company would be required to provide a clear description of the relationship among the measures provided in the tabular form (including these three additional measures we are considering requiring), but would be allowed to choose the format used to present the relationship, such as a graph or narrative description.
Additional and Supplemental Disclosure
The reporting company may provide additional and supplemental disclosure to the extent that such additional disclosure is useful to an understanding of the pay vs. performance discussion. As with any information, the additional information cannot be misleading or detract from the basic disclosure elements required by the new proposed rules.
Inline XBRL Tagging
The new disclosure must be tagged using Inline XBRL.
The rule allows for a phase-in period. In the first filing following the effectiveness of the proposed rule, companies will only be required to provide two years of disclosure and will need to add an additional year of disclosure for each subsequent year’s filing until the required number of years of disclosure has been achieved (3 years for smaller reporting companies and 5 years for all others).
Securities attorney Laura Anthony and her experienced legal team provide ongoing corporate counsel to small and mid-size private companies, OTC and exchange traded public companies as well as private companies going public on the Nasdaq, NYSE American or over-the-counter market, such as the OTCQB and OTCQX. For more than two decades Anthony L.G., PLLC has served clients providing fast, personalized, cutting-edge legal service. The firm’s reputation and relationships provide invaluable resources to clients including introductions to investment bankers, broker-dealers, institutional investors and other strategic alliances. The firm’s focus includes, but is not limited to, compliance with the Securities Act of 1933 offer sale and registration requirements, including private placement transactions under Regulation D and Regulation S and PIPE Transactions, securities token offerings and initial coin offerings, Regulation A/A+ offerings, as well as registration statements on Forms S-1, S-3, S-8 and merger registrations on Form S-4; compliance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including registration on Form 10, reporting on Forms 10-Q, 10-K and 8-K, and 14C Information and 14A Proxy Statements; all forms of going public transactions; mergers and acquisitions including both reverse mergers and forward mergers; applications to and compliance with the corporate governance requirements of securities exchanges including Nasdaq and NYSE American; general corporate; and general contract and business transactions. Ms. Anthony and her firm represent both target and acquiring companies in merger and acquisition transactions, including the preparation of transaction documents such as merger agreements, share exchange agreements, stock purchase agreements, asset purchase agreements and reorganization agreements. The ALG legal team assists Pubcos in complying with the requirements of federal and state securities laws and SROs such as FINRA for 15c2-11 applications, corporate name changes, reverse and forward splits and changes of domicile. Ms. Anthony is also the author of SecuritiesLawBlog.com, the small-cap and middle market’s top source for industry news, and the producer and host of LawCast.com, Corporate Finance in Focus. In addition to many other major metropolitan areas, the firm currently represents clients in New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Boca Raton, West Palm Beach, Atlanta, Phoenix, Scottsdale, Charlotte, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Washington, D.C., Denver, Tampa, Detroit and Dallas.
Ms. Anthony is a member of various professional organizations including the Crowdfunding Professional Association (CfPA), Palm Beach County Bar Association, the Florida Bar Association, the American Bar Association and the ABA committees on Federal Securities Regulations and Private Equity and Venture Capital. She is a supporter of several community charities including siting on the board of directors of the American Red Cross for Palm Beach and Martin Counties, and providing financial support to the Susan Komen Foundation, Opportunity, Inc., New Hope Charities, the Society of the Four Arts, the Norton Museum of Art, Palm Beach County Zoo Society, the Kravis Center for the Performing Arts and several others. She is also a financial and hands-on supporter of Palm Beach Day Academy, one of Palm Beach’s oldest and most respected educational institutions. She currently resides in Palm Beach with her husband and daughter.
Ms. Anthony is an honors graduate from Florida State University College of Law and has been practicing law since 1993.
Contact Anthony L.G., PLLC. Inquiries of a technical nature are always encouraged.
Listen to our podcast on iTunes Podcast channel.
Lawcast is derived from the term podcast and specifically refers to a series of news segments that explain the technical aspects of corporate finance and securities law. The accepted interpretation of lawcast is most commonly used when referring to LawCast.com, the securities law network. Example: “LawCast expounds on NASDAQ listing requirements.”
Anthony L.G., PLLC makes this general information available for educational purposes only. The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. Furthermore, the use of this information, and the sending or receipt of this information, does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship between us. Therefore, your communication with us via this information in any form will not be considered as privileged or confidential.
This information is not intended to be advertising, and Anthony L.G., PLLC does not desire to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this information in a jurisdiction where this information fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that jurisdiction. This information may only be reproduced in its entirety (without modification) for the individual reader’s personal and/or educational use and must include this notice.
© Anthony L.G., PLLC