As 2022 and 2023 have continued to be extremely tough years for the capital markets many small cap companies find themselves failing to maintain the minimum continued listing requirements. I’ve recently written about those continued listing requirements, see HERE, and Nasdaq’s proposed rule changes for reverse split notifications as companies struggle to maintain the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement, see HERE.
These blogs provide a perfect segue for a deep dive into the Nasdaq deficiency notice and delisting process. In this first blog in the series, I provided an overview of deficiencies, deficiency notices, cure periods and compliance plans – see HERE. In Part 2, I reviewed the hearing panel process – see HERE. In this Part 3, I will review the appeals to the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review Council and delisting. I note that the Nasdaq rules also contain administrative rules regarding the conduct of adjudicators and advisors and the adjudication process, which are beyond the scope of this blog series.
Appeal to the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review Council
A company may appeal a Panel Decision to the Listing Council and the Listing Council may also call for review a Panel Decision on its own initiative. A written request for appeal must be submitted within 15 calendar days of the date of the Panel Decision. An appeal fee of $15,000 must be included with the appeal request. An appeal does not stay the Panel Decision. Upon receipt of a request for appeal, the Listing Council will provide deadlines for the company to provide written submissions.
When the Listing Council reviews a decision on its own initiative, it must do so within 45 calendar days of the Panel Decision. Although the review does not operate as an automatic stay, the Listing Council has the power to stay the Panel Decision pending its review.
Scope of Listing Council Discretion
The Listing Council has the power to affirm, modify, or reverse the Panel Decision, issue a Public Reprimand Letter, or remand the matter to the Listing Qualifications Department or to the Hearings Panel for further consideration. The Listing Council may also grant an exception to the continued listing requirements for a period not to exceed 360 days from the initial Staff Delisting Determination, or in the case of delinquent SEC reports, for a period not to exceed 360 days from the due date of the first late report, or for the failure to timely hold an annual meeting, from the deadline for such meeting. Accordingly, any extra time periods granted by the Hearing Panel prior to Listing Council review will be deducted from this maximum period. Moreover, the Listing Council can impose more additional or more stringent continued listing requirements where it deems warranted.
Similar to all Nasdaq review processes, the Listing Council will consider all facts and circumstances including whether the violation was inadvertent, materially adversely affected shareholders’ interests, has been cured, whether the company reasonably relied on an independent advisor and whether the company has demonstrated a pattern of violations. The Listing Council will also consider any post Hearing Panel violations of listing standards.
Listing Council Review Process
For each matter, a subcommittee of at least two members of the Listing Council will review the written record and provide a summary to the other members. In addition to the written record, the Listing Council can request additional written materials or hold an additional hearing. Any hearing will be scheduled within 45 days of the appeal. A written Listing Council Decision will be issued after approval by at least a majority of the Listing Council.
A company may request, in writing, that the Listing Council reconsider a decision only upon the basis that a mistake of material fact existed at the time of the Listing Council Decision. Such a request must be submitted within seven calendar days and will not stay the Decision unless the Listing Council specifically allows it. If a reconsideration is granted, the modified decision must be rendered within 15 calendar days of the original decision.
If the Listing Council determines to delist the company, the securities will be immediately suspended, unless the Listing Council Decision specifies to the contrary.
Discretionary Review by Nasdaq Board
A Listing Council or Hearing Panel decision may be reviewed the Board of Directors of Nasdaq solely upon the request of one or more Board members not later than the next Nasdaq Board meeting that is 15 calendar days or more following the date of the Panel or Listing Council Decision. This review is solely at the discretion of the Board and does not stay any Panel or Council decisions unless the Board specifies otherwise.
A Nasdaq Board review is substantially similar to a Listing Council review. The Board will consider all facts and circumstances including failures not previously raised and conduct during the review process. A company will be provided with notice of a Board review and have the opportunity to submit written materials. A Board review is generally just based on written materials.
The Nasdaq Board may affirm, modify or reverse the Panel or Listing Council Decision and may remand the matter to the Listing Council, Hearings Panel, or staff of the Listing Qualifications Department with appropriate instructions. The Board may also issue a Public Reprimand Letter where it determines that delisting is not warranted.
Delisting
Where a final determination has been made to delist a company’s securities, Nasdaq will immediately take action to do so including filing a Form 25 with the SEC. A delisting determination is deemed final when all available review and appeal procedures have been utilized or the time for which expired. Nasdaq publishes a list of delisted securities on its website.
The Author
Laura Anthony, Esq.
Founding Partner
Anthony L.G., PLLC
A Corporate Law Firm
Securities attorney Laura Anthony and her experienced legal team provide ongoing corporate counsel to small and mid-size private companies, public companies as well as private companies going public on the Nasdaq, NYSE American or over-the-counter market, such as the OTCQB and OTCQX. For more than two decades Anthony L.G., PLLC has served clients providing fast, personalized, cutting-edge legal service. The firm’s reputation and relationships provide invaluable resources to clients including introductions to investment bankers, broker-dealers, institutional investors and other strategic alliances. The firm’s focus includes, but is not limited to, compliance with the Securities Act of 1933 offer sale and registration requirements, including private placement transactions under Regulation D and Regulation S and PIPE Transactions, securities token offerings and initial coin offerings, Regulation A/A+ offerings, as well as registration statements on Forms S-1, S-3, S-8 and merger registrations on Form S-4; compliance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including registration on Form 10, reporting on Forms 10-Q, 10-K and 8-K, and 14C Information and 14A Proxy Statements; all forms of going public transactions; mergers and acquisitions including both reverse mergers and forward mergers; applications to and compliance with the corporate governance requirements of securities exchanges including Nasdaq and NYSE American; general corporate; and general contract and business transactions. Ms. Anthony and her firm represent both target and acquiring companies in merger and acquisition transactions, including the preparation of transaction documents such as merger agreements, share exchange agreements, stock purchase agreements, asset purchase agreements and reorganization agreements. The ALG legal team assists Pubcos in complying with the requirements of federal and state securities laws and SROs such as FINRA for 15c2-11 applications, corporate name changes, reverse and forward splits and changes of domicile. Ms. Anthony is also the author of SecuritiesLawBlog.com, the small-cap and middle market’s top source for industry news, and the producer and host of LawCast.com, Corporate Finance in Focus. In addition to many other major metropolitan areas, the firm currently represents clients in New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Boca Raton, West Palm Beach, Atlanta, Phoenix, Scottsdale, Charlotte, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Washington, D.C., Denver, Tampa, Detroit and Dallas.
Ms. Anthony is a member of various professional organizations including the Crowdfunding Professional Association (CfPA), Palm Beach County Bar Association, the Florida Bar Association, the American Bar Association and the ABA committees on Federal Securities Regulations and Private Equity and Venture Capital. She is a supporter of several community charities including the American Red Cross for Palm Beach and Martin Counties, Susan Komen Foundation, Opportunity, Inc., New Hope Charities, the Society of the Four Arts, the Norton Museum of Art, Palm Beach County Zoo Society, the Kravis Center for the Performing Arts and several others.
Ms. Anthony is an honors graduate from Florida State University College of Law and has been practicing law since 1993.
Contact Anthony L.G., PLLC. Inquiries of a technical nature are always encouraged.
Follow Anthony L.G., PLLC on Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Pinterest and Twitter.
Anthony L.G., PLLC makes this general information available for educational purposes only. The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. Furthermore, the use of this information, and the sending or receipt of this information, does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship between us. Therefore, your communication with us via this information in any form will not be considered as privileged or confidential.
© Anthony L.G., PLLC
